Nelson v. Norris

Eighth Circuit

Nelson v. Norris

33 F. App'x 230

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2002·No. No. 01-2258·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Anthony Nelson appeals from the district court’s¹ preservice dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We deny his motion for service of summons. Having reviewed the record de novo, we conclude Nelson both failed to show he exhausted his administrative remedies and failed to allege a constitutional injury. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); McAlphin v. Morgan, 216 F.3d 680, 682 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam); Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783-85 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Anthony Nelson appeals from the district court’s¹ preservice dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We deny his motion for service of summons. Having reviewed the record de novo, we conclude Nelson both failed to show he exhausted his administrative remedies and failed to allege a constitutional injury. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); McAlphin v. Morgan, 216 F.3d 680, 682 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam); Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783-85 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Nelson v. Norris, 33 F. App'x 230 (8th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

33 F. App'x 230 (Nelson v. Norris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related