Nelson v. Norris

Eighth Circuit

Nelson v. Norris

33 F. App'x 230

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedApril 3, 2002

DocketNo. 01-2258

StatusPublished

This text of 33 F. App'x 230 (Nelson v. Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nelson v. Norris, 33 F. App'x 230 (8th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Anthony Nelson appeals from the district court’s¹ preservice dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We deny his motion for service of summons. Having reviewed the record de novo, we conclude Nelson both failed to show he exhausted his administrative remedies and failed to allege a constitutional injury. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); McAlphin v. Morgan, 216 F.3d 680, 682 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam); Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783-85 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Anthony Nelson appeals from the district court’s¹ preservice dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We deny his motion for service of summons. Having reviewed the record de novo, we conclude Nelson both failed to show he exhausted his administrative remedies and failed to allege a constitutional injury. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); McAlphin v. Morgan, 216 F.3d 680, 682 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam); Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783-85 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 F. App'x 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-norris-ca8-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack