Nelson v. Nordstrom, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nelson v. Nordstrom, Inc.

382 S.W.3d 192, 2012 WL 3805712, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1082

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 4, 2012·No. No. ED 98019·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Fredrick Nelson (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the dismissal of his claim for unemployment benefits because Claimant failed to participate in the scheduled hearing before the appeals tribunal. We find the Commission did not err in affirming the dismissal of Claimant’s appeal. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

[193] The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Fredrick Nelson (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the dismissal of his claim for unemployment benefits because Claimant failed to participate in the scheduled hearing before the appeals tribunal. We find the Commission did not err in affirming the dismissal of Claimant’s appeal. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

[193] The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Nelson v. Nordstrom, Inc., 382 S.W.3d 192, 2012 WL 3805712, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1082 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

382 S.W.3d 192 (Nelson v. Nordstrom, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.