Nelson v. Nelson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Nelson v. Nelson

14 Ohio Law. Abs. 34, 1933 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1678

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 24, 1933

DocketNo 2263

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Ohio Law. Abs. 34 (Nelson v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nelson v. Nelson, 14 Ohio Law. Abs. 34, 1933 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1678 (Ohio Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT

This case is submitted upon a motion to dismiss the petition in error. The reason assigned is that the plaintiff in error has taken certain actions with reference to the alimony features inconsistent with the petition in error. It will be noted, however, that the petition in error only asks for the reversal of so much of the judgment as awards to John H. Nelson the divorce.

This is upon the ground that the judgment for divorce is so intimately connected with the allowance of alimony as to affect the validity of that allowance. We have considered this motion, but we have reached no definite conclusion as to the merits. We think that the motion should be postponed to the final hearing of the case «o that we may determine as to whether the judgment for alimony is so connected with the divorce as to be affected thereby in case the petition in error is found to be valid. Judgment on the motion postponed until the final hearing of the case.

ALLREAD, PJ, HORNBECK and KUNKLE, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT

This case is submitted upon a motion to dismiss the petition in error. The reason assigned is that the plaintiff in error has taken certain actions with reference to the alimony features inconsistent with the petition in error. It will be noted, however, that the petition in error only asks for the reversal of so much of the judgment as awards to John H. Nelson the divorce.

This is upon the ground that the judgment for divorce is so intimately connected with the allowance of alimony as to affect the validity of that allowance. We have considered this motion, but we have reached no definite conclusion as to the merits. We think that the motion should be postponed to the final hearing of the case «o that we may determine as to whether the judgment for alimony is so connected with the divorce as to be affected thereby in case the petition in error is found to be valid. Judgment on the motion postponed until the final hearing of the case.

ALLREAD, PJ, HORNBECK and KUNKLE, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Ohio Law. Abs. 34, 1933 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-nelson-ohioctapp-1933.