Nelson v. Nelson
This text of 104 S.E. 779 (Nelson v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. On the hearing of a rule requiring the respondent to show cause why he should not be adjudged in contempt for failure to pay alimony in pursuance of an order formerly granted, while the evidence was conflicting, there was evidence submitted in behalf of the respondent which authorized the judge to find that subsequently to the grant of alimony the petitioner and the respondent had voluntarily lived together and cohabited as husband and wife for something like a month, that he afterwards left her by reason oE the discovery for the first time that she had committed adultery after the allowance of alimony and between the date of their separation and their rccohabitation, and that later ho obtained a total [672]*672divorce from her on the ground of her adultery. Held, that this was sufficient cause to warrant the judge in refusing to make the rule absolute. See Jennison v. Jennison, 136 Ga. 202 (3a), 2l0 (71 S. E. 244, Ann. Cas. 1912C, 441).
2. It was not error to admit in evidence, on behalf of the respondent, the record of the divorce proceedings; nor was there error in the other rulings as to the admission of evidence, which requires a reversal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 S.E. 779, 150 Ga. 671, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-nelson-ga-1920.