Nelson v. Mundt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nelson v. Mundt

32 A.D.2d 951, 303 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3436

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 7, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 32 A.D.2d 951 (Nelson v. Mundt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nelson v. Mundt, 32 A.D.2d 951, 303 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to declare a certain local law unconstitutional, defendants appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered December 13, 1968, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Plaintiffs are the owners of a large shopping center in New City, Town of Clarkstown, Rockland County. In front of the businesses' in plaintiffs’ shopping center is a substantial parking area. Adjoining plaintiffs’'northern boundary is a considerably smaller shopping center. Its parking area, located next to that of the plaintiffs, is comparatively modest in size. Traffic is fed into both shopping centers by a State highway, Route 304, which runs along their eastern boundaries. In 1966, the Town Board of the Town of Clarkstown enacted, as Local Law No. 2, a “ local law providing for the construction, repair and maintenance of shopping center parking areas.” In 1967, the Town Board enacted the local law here in question, as Local Law No. 6, which, in part, amended the 1966 law by adding the following provision: “ Every owner shall maintain that portion of his property bordering adjacent shopping centers free from any artificial physical separations, such as walls, rails, fences or berms, except as approved by an official town body, such as the planning board, zoning board of appeals, building inspector or police department, so as to permit the easy and unobstructed flow of pedestrian and vehicular traffic between adjacent shopping centers.” Without deciding whether the 1967 law is unconstitutional because it deprives plaintiffs of their property without due process of law, we conclude that the 1967 law is unconstitutional for want of defendants’ legislative authority to enact it (see N. Y. Const., art. IX, § 2; Municipal Home Rule Law, § 10, subd. 1, par. [ii], cl. a, subels. [6], [11]). The Town Board has not been authorized to legislate, concerning traffic between adjoining private parcels of land; hence, it cannot assert its police power in justification of the 1967 law (see People v. Lewis, 295 N. Y. 42, 49; Good Humor Corp. v. City of New York, 290 N. Y. 312). Brennan, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to declare a certain local law unconstitutional, defendants appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered December 13, 1968, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Plaintiffs are the owners of a large shopping center in New City, Town of Clarkstown, Rockland County. In front of the businesses' in plaintiffs’ shopping center is a substantial parking area. Adjoining plaintiffs’'northern boundary is a considerably smaller shopping center. Its parking area, located next to that of the plaintiffs, is comparatively modest in size. Traffic is fed into both shopping centers by a State highway, Route 304, which runs along their eastern boundaries. In 1966, the Town Board of the Town of Clarkstown enacted, as Local Law No. 2, a “ local law providing for the construction, repair and maintenance of shopping center parking areas.” In 1967, the Town Board enacted the local law here in question, as Local Law No. 6, which, in part, amended the 1966 law by adding the following provision: “ Every owner shall maintain that portion of his property bordering adjacent shopping centers free from any artificial physical separations, such as walls, rails, fences or berms, except as approved by an official town body, such as the planning board, zoning board of appeals, building inspector or police department, so as to permit the easy and unobstructed flow of pedestrian and vehicular traffic between adjacent shopping centers.” Without deciding whether the 1967 law is unconstitutional because it deprives plaintiffs of their property without due process of law, we conclude that the 1967 law is unconstitutional for want of defendants’ legislative authority to enact it (see N. Y. Const., art. IX, § 2; Municipal Home Rule Law, § 10, subd. 1, par. [ii], cl. a, subels. [6], [11]). The Town Board has not been authorized to legislate, concerning traffic between adjoining private parcels of land; hence, it cannot assert its police power in justification of the 1967 law (see People v. Lewis, 295 N. Y. 42, 49; Good Humor Corp. v. City of New York, 290 N. Y. 312). Brennan, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 951, 303 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-mundt-nyappdiv-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack