Nelson v. Munch

14 N.W. 578, 30 Minn. 132, 1883 Minn. LEXIS 104
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 9, 1883·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court,.

Where several plaintiffs or defendants bring an appeal from a judgment, and it is modified as to some of the appellants and affirmed as to the others, the respondent is entitled to costs and disbursements against those as to whom it is affirmed, and those as to whom it is modified are entitled to costs and disbursements against the respondent. The clerk’s taxation is set aside and costs will be taxed in accordance herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nelson v. Munch, 14 N.W. 578, 30 Minn. 132, 1883 Minn. LEXIS 104 (Mich. 1883).

14 N.W. 578 (Nelson v. Munch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morken v. St. Pierre
179 N.W. 681 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1920)