Nelson v. Milwaukee Mechanics Insurance

South Dakota Supreme Court

Nelson v. Milwaukee Mechanics Insurance

229 N.W. 805, 56 S.D. 552, 1930 S.D. LEXIS 36

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 21, 1930

DocketFile Nos. 6920-6921

StatusPublished

This text of 229 N.W. 805 (Nelson v. Milwaukee Mechanics Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nelson v. Milwaukee Mechanics Insurance, 229 N.W. 805, 56 S.D. 552, 1930 S.D. LEXIS 36 (S.D. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These two cases, 6920 and 6921, were brought to recover on fire insurance policies. Both policies covered the same property, and the loss under each policy was caused 'by the same fire. The defense in each case is based on what the [553]*553defendants claim to be fraud and falsehood in the preparation and presentation of plaintiff’s proofs of loss. The cases were tried to the court without a jury. Findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment were for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Both appeals are submitted on the same briefs.

After a careful examination of the record, we are of the opinion that no prejudicial error was committed by the trial court, and that both judgments are warranted by the record.

The judgments appealed from are affirmed.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These two cases, 6920 and 6921, were brought to recover on fire insurance policies. Both policies covered the same property, and the loss under each policy was caused 'by the same fire. The defense in each case is based on what the [553]*553defendants claim to be fraud and falsehood in the preparation and presentation of plaintiff’s proofs of loss. The cases were tried to the court without a jury. Findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment were for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Both appeals are submitted on the same briefs.

After a careful examination of the record, we are of the opinion that no prejudicial error was committed by the trial court, and that both judgments are warranted by the record.

The judgments appealed from are affirmed.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 N.W. 805, 56 S.D. 552, 1930 S.D. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-milwaukee-mechanics-insurance-sd-1930.