Nelson v. Merrimack House

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

December 31, 1992
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 92-1753 

                                ERNEST HOWARD NELSON,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                        MERRIMACK COUNTY HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS,

                                 Defendant, Appellee.

____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Norman H. Stahl, U.S. District Judge]
                                            ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________

                                 ____________________

            Ernest Howard Nelson on brief pro se.
            ____________________
            Wayne  C. Beyer, Richard  C. Dale,  II, and  Cleveland, Waters and
            _______________  _____________________       _____________________
        Bass, P.A. on brief for appellee.
        __________

____________________

____________________

Per  Curiam.   The  judgment  is  affirmed for  the
                      ___________

            reasons stated in  the magistrate's May  13, 1992 report  and

            recommendations.  Appellant's motion for  default judgment is

            denied.

                      Affirmed.  Loc. R. 27.1.
                      ________