Nelson v. McMullen, Snare & Triest, Inc.

184 A.D. 900

This text of 184 A.D. 900 (Nelson v. McMullen, Snare & Triest, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. McMullen, Snare & Triest, Inc., 184 A.D. 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Plaintiff’s proofs did not show the source of the concrete blocks which upset the coal cart th’at he was driving. These obstructions had been in this Lexington avenue roadway about an hour. But it was shown that no carts left defendant’s shaft at One Hundred and Twentieth street on the day of this accident. Although carts carried material from the One Hundred and Twenty-third street shaft, it did not appear that they drove along this block between One Hundred and Eighteenth street and One Hundred and Nineteenth street, where these blocks were lying. Plaintiff’s ease, therefore, did not connect defendant with the cause of his injury. (Baulec v. New York & Harlem R. R. Co., 59 N. Y. 356; Travell v. Bannerman, 174 id. 47, 52; Idel v. Mitchell, 158 id. 134, 138; Ruppert v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 154 id. 90; Francis v. Gaffey, 211 id. 47.) The judgment and order are, therefore, reversed, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baulec v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.
59 N.Y. 356 (New York Court of Appeals, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 A.D. 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-mcmullen-snare-triest-inc-nyappdiv-1918.