Nelson v. Kulongoski

905 P.2d 1152, 322 Or. 328, 1995 Ore. LEXIS 128
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 24, 1995
DocketSC S42642
StatusPublished

This text of 905 P.2d 1152 (Nelson v. Kulongoski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. Kulongoski, 905 P.2d 1152, 322 Or. 328, 1995 Ore. LEXIS 128 (Or. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is an original proceeding for review of a ballot title for an initiative measure that proposes to add a new section to the Oregon Constitution. Petitioners are electors who filed comments with the Secretary of State pursuant to ORS 250.067(1) and who, therefore, are entitled to bring this proceeding under ORS 250.085.

The Attorney General certified this ballot title for the proposed initiative measure:

“AMENDS CONSTITUTION: PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS MUST REPORT ILLEGAL ALIEN INFORMATION TO IMMIGRATION AUTHORITIES
“RESULT OF NES’ VOTE: Ties’ vote requires public institutions to report illegal alien information to federal immigration authorities.
“RESULT OF NO’ VOTE: No’ vote rejects requiring public institutions to report illegal alien information to federal immigration authorities.
“SUMMARY: Amends Oregon Constitution. Requires state, local governments and publicly-funded institutions having probative information that a person is an illegal alien to report information to federal immigration authorities. Requires such entities having probative information that an arrested person is an illegal alien to report information to federal immigration authorities. Forbids state, local governments, publicly-funded institutions from adopting or enforcing law or policy prohibiting or hindering cooperation between such entities and federal immigration authorities. Allows governments and United States citizens to sue to enforce measure.”

We have considered all of petitioners’ arguments as to why that ballot title does not comply substantially with the requirements of ORS 250.035(2). We are not persuaded by any of those arguments. Accordingly, we decline to modify the Attorney General’s ballot title.

Ballot title certified. This decision shall become effective in accordance with ORAP 11.30(9).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 250.067
Oregon § 250.067
§ 250.085
Oregon § 250.085
§ 250.035
Oregon § 250.035

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
905 P.2d 1152, 322 Or. 328, 1995 Ore. LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-kulongoski-or-1995.