Nelson v. HQT, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nelson v. HQT, INC.

334 S.W.3d 627, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 123, 2011 WL 397661

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 8, 2011·No. ED 94893·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tiffany Nelson (“Nelson”) appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“the Commission”) determination that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because she was discharged for misconduct connected with her work. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tiffany Nelson (“Nelson”) appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“the Commission”) determination that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because she was discharged for misconduct connected with her work. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Nelson v. HQT, INC., 334 S.W.3d 627, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 123, 2011 WL 397661 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

334 S.W.3d 627 (Nelson v. HQT, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related