Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Nelson v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.

Nelson v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.

641 So. 2d 144, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7071, 1994 WL 372883
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 19, 1994
DocketNo. 93-2193
StatusPublished

This text of 641 So. 2d 144 (Nelson v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc., 641 So. 2d 144, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7071, 1994 WL 372883 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nelson appeals from a final order of the judge of compensation claims finding that his claim for medical care and treatment was time barred by section 440.19, Florida Statutes. We reverse and remand for a determination of whether the claimant would have qualified for employer-furnished medical treatment if he had not been incarcerated. USS Agri-Chemicals v. Waddell, 537 So.2d 111 (Fla.1989); Tauben v. Joe’s Stone Crabs, Inc., 632 So.2d 102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Reversed and remanded.

BARFIELD, MINER, and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

USS Agri-Chemicals v. Waddell
537 So. 2d 111 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Tauben v. Joe's Stone Crabs, Inc.
632 So. 2d 102 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
641 So. 2d 144, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7071, 1994 WL 372883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-henkels-mccoy-inc-fladistctapp-1994.