Nelson v. Henderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nelson v. Henderson

40 A.D.2d 996, 338 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3154

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 996 (Nelson v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nelson v. Henderson, 40 A.D.2d 996, 338 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 26, 1972, which denied their motion for leave to serve an amended and supplemental bill of particulars. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted, with leave to defendants to procure new physical examinations of plaintiffs, upon written notice of not less than 10 days. The amended and supplemental bill of particulars must be served within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. In the interests of justice, plaintiffs should be permitted to proceed to trial on all of their claims. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 26, 1972, which denied their motion for leave to serve an amended and supplemental bill of particulars. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted, with leave to defendants to procure new physical examinations of plaintiffs, upon written notice of not less than 10 days. The amended and supplemental bill of particulars must be served within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. In the interests of justice, plaintiffs should be permitted to proceed to trial on all of their claims. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 996, 338 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-henderson-nyappdiv-1972.