Nelson v. Hamilton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6333

RICKY DONNELL NELSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LARRY K. HAMILTON; TOD RUNYON; VALERIE CARTER; OFFICER SMALL; LIEUTENANT WETHERHEAD; LIEUTENANT RANDLE; LIEUTENANT CHALLOUGHLCZISE; MARY JANE VIVEROS; WILLIAM DANFORD,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-03-741-2)

Submitted: July 13, 2005 Decided: August 2, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Donnell Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Ricky Donnell Nelson appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nelson v.

Hamilton, No. CA-03-741-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2005). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -