Nelson v. Gal

Fourth Circuit

Nelson v. Gal

34 F. App'x 124

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 9, 2002·No. No. 02-6310·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nelson v. Gal, No. CA-01-4588-2-22-AJ (D.S.C. filed Jan. 30, entered Jan. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nelson v. Gal, No. CA-01-4588-2-22-AJ (D.S.C. filed Jan. 30, entered Jan. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Nelson v. Gal, 34 F. App'x 124 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

34 F. App'x 124 (Nelson v. Gal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related