Nelson v. Futral

Indiana Supreme Court

Nelson v. Futral

17 Ind. 340, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 433

DecidedDecember 9, 1861

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Ind. 340 (Nelson v. Futral) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nelson v. Futral, 17 Ind. 340, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 433 (Ind. 1861).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was an action by Nelson, as assignee of a promissory note, against Futral, the assignor. The issues were submitted to the Court, who found for the defendant, and, having refused a new trial, rendered judgment, &c. The causes assigned for a new trial relate to the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding. The evidence given upon the trial is set out in tire record. We have examined it carefully, and though it is, to some extent, conflicting, we are of opinion that its weight accords with the finding of the Court.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was an action by Nelson, as assignee of a promissory note, against Futral, the assignor. The issues were submitted to the Court, who found for the defendant, and, having refused a new trial, rendered judgment, &c. The causes assigned for a new trial relate to the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding. The evidence given upon the trial is set out in tire record. We have examined it carefully, and though it is, to some extent, conflicting, we are of opinion that its weight accords with the finding of the Court.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Ind. 340, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-futral-ind-1861.