Nelson v. Floyd

4 P. 105, 2 Cal. Unrep. 325
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJune 13, 1884
DocketNo. 7644
StatusPublished

This text of 4 P. 105 (Nelson v. Floyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. Floyd, 4 P. 105, 2 Cal. Unrep. 325 (Cal. 1884).

Opinion

By the COURT.

Appeals from an order granting a new trial. The decision and judgment, which the court set aside, were founded upon substantially conflicting evidence, bearing upon the main questions, as issue between the parties, as to the existence and extent of the subordinate claims and liens against the building- in controversy; and as the court set the judgment aside and granted a new trial upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to justify them, this court, in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion, will not disturb the order: Guttierrez v. Brinkerhoff, 9 Pac. C. L. J. 734; Blum v. Sunol, 63 Cal. 341, 11 Pac. C. L. J. 275; Pierce v. Schaden, 55 Cal. 406; Bronner v. Wetzlar, 55 Cal. 419.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pierce v. Schaden
55 Cal. 406 (California Supreme Court, 1880)
Bronner v. Wetzlar
55 Cal. 419 (California Supreme Court, 1880)
Blum v. Sunol
63 Cal. 341 (California Supreme Court, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 P. 105, 2 Cal. Unrep. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-floyd-cal-1884.