Nelson v. Fischer

93 A.D.3d 1059, 940 N.Y.S.2d 497
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 22, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 93 A.D.3d 1059 (Nelson v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. Fischer, 93 A.D.3d 1059, 940 N.Y.S.2d 497 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was observed by a correction officer engaged in a fight with another inmate and petitioner continued fighting despite several direct orders to cease. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with assault, fighting, violent conduct and refusing a direct order. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of all charges. After the determination was upheld upon administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, supporting documentation and testimony of the correction officer who witnessed petitioner’s participation in the fight provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Barnes v Prack, 87 AD3d 1216, 1216 [2011]; Matter of Machicote v Bezio, 87 AD3d 763, 763 [2011]). Testimony by petitioner and his inmate witness that petitioner had been misidentified raised a credibility question to be resolved by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Kalwasinski v Fischer, 87 AD3d 1207, 1208 [2011]; Matter of Barnes v Prack, 87 AD3d at 1217). Finally, the record demonstrates that the finding of guilt was premised upon the evidence presented at the hearing, rather than alleged hearing officer bias (see Matter of Polite v Fischer, 87 AD3d 1212, 1212 [2011] ).

Mercure, A.EJ., Peters, Rose, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Ramos v. Venettozzi
131 A.D.3d 1309 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Byas v. Fischer
105 A.D.3d 1229 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Wigfall v. Department of Correctional Services
100 A.D.3d 1211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Wright v. Fischer
98 A.D.3d 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Gallagher v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
96 A.D.3d 1319 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 A.D.3d 1059, 940 N.Y.S.2d 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2012.