Nelson v. Di Lallo
This text of 54 Misc. 2d 133 (Nelson v. Di Lallo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The amount sought in the complaint was within the monetary jurisdiction of the City Court of Bye (O’Farrell v. Martin, 161 Mise. 353). However, in the absence of any showing of consent of the parties, the court was without jurisdiction to render decision herein after 30 days from the time when the case was submitted (HCCA, § 1304), and the judgment entered thereon was a nullity (cf. Patrzykowski v. Mursten, 250 App. Div. 355; Smith v. Weitz, 14 Misc 2d 519).
The judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and a new trial ordered.
Concur — Martuscello, Groat and Coyle, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 Misc. 2d 133, 281 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-di-lallo-nyappterm-1967.