Nelson v. Court
This text of 316 F. App'x 668 (Nelson v. Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Patrick Nelson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his mandamus petition seeking orders requiring the California Supreme Court and the State Bar of California to compel counsel to release work product so that he may file a habeas corpus petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
In a mandamus action, a federal court has authority only to issue orders against employees, officers, or agencies of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1361. We therefore affirm the denial of Nelson’s petition. See Kildare v. Saenz, 325 F.3d 1078, 1084 (9th Cir.2003).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
316 F. App'x 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-court-ca9-2009.