Nelson v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Nelson v. City of St. Paul

256 N.W.2d 639, 1977 Minn. LEXIS 1506

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJuly 15, 1977

DocketNo. 47062

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 256 N.W.2d 639 (Nelson v. City of St. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nelson v. City of St. Paul, 256 N.W.2d 639, 1977 Minn. LEXIS 1506 (Mich. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gust and Alvina Nelson, in accordance with appropriate statutory provisions, challenged the validity of certain assessments levied by the city of St. Paul against their [640]*640real property. The trial court determined that the amount of the assessment was in excess of the benefits to the property and that the improvements actually conferred no benefit on the property. The city of St. Paul appeals from the judgment. We affirm.

A detailed statement of the facts is unnecessary. We have reviewed the proceedings herein and hold that the trial court properly applied the standards we have established for review of assessments. See, Gibbish v. Village of Burnsville, 294 Minn. 313, 200 N.W.2d 310 (1972); Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, Minn., 240 N.W.2d 517 (1976). The findings by the trial court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 52.01, Rules of Civil Procedure.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gust and Alvina Nelson, in accordance with appropriate statutory provisions, challenged the validity of certain assessments levied by the city of St. Paul against their [640]*640real property. The trial court determined that the amount of the assessment was in excess of the benefits to the property and that the improvements actually conferred no benefit on the property. The city of St. Paul appeals from the judgment. We affirm.

A detailed statement of the facts is unnecessary. We have reviewed the proceedings herein and hold that the trial court properly applied the standards we have established for review of assessments. See, Gibbish v. Village of Burnsville, 294 Minn. 313, 200 N.W.2d 310 (1972); Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom, Minn., 240 N.W.2d 517 (1976). The findings by the trial court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 52.01, Rules of Civil Procedure.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 N.W.2d 639, 1977 Minn. LEXIS 1506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-city-of-st-paul-minn-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack