Nelson v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nelson v. City of New York

52 A.D.2d 918, 384 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12759

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 17, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered July 16, 1975, in his favor, after a jury trial, which judgment recites that his motion to set aside the verdict as insufficient is denied. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, motion granted, and new trial granted limited to the issue of damages. The findings of fact were not considered. In our view, the damages awarded were inadequate. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Hartuscello, Latham, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered July 16, 1975, in his favor, after a jury trial, which judgment recites that his motion to set aside the verdict as insufficient is denied. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, motion granted, and new trial granted limited to the issue of damages. The findings of fact were not considered. In our view, the damages awarded were inadequate. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Hartuscello, Latham, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Nelson v. City of New York, 52 A.D.2d 918, 384 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

52 A.D.2d 918 (Nelson v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related