Nelson v. City of New York
This text of 52 A.D.2d 918 (Nelson v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered July 16, 1975, in his favor, after a jury trial, which judgment recites that his motion to set aside the verdict as insufficient is denied. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, motion granted, and new trial granted limited to the issue of damages. The findings of fact were not considered. In our view, the damages awarded were inadequate. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Hartuscello, Latham, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 A.D.2d 918, 384 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1976.