Nelson v. Barnhart

Fourth Circuit

Nelson v. Barnhart

104 F. App'x 363

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 18, 2004·No. No. 04-1241·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Danielle Nelson appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Nelson v. Barnhart, No. CA-03-842 (E.D. Ya. filed Dec. 19, 2003, entered Dec. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Danielle Nelson appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Nelson v. Barnhart, No. CA-03-842 (E.D. Ya. filed Dec. 19, 2003, entered Dec. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Nelson v. Barnhart, 104 F. App'x 363 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

104 F. App'x 363 (Nelson v. Barnhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.