Nelson v. Barnhart

Fourth Circuit

Nelson v. Barnhart

104 F. App'x 363

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 18, 2004

DocketNo. 04-1241

StatusPublished

This text of 104 F. App'x 363 (Nelson v. Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nelson v. Barnhart, 104 F. App'x 363 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Danielle Nelson appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Nelson v. Barnhart, No. CA-03-842 (E.D. Ya. filed Dec. 19, 2003, entered Dec. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Danielle Nelson appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Nelson v. Barnhart, No. CA-03-842 (E.D. Ya. filed Dec. 19, 2003, entered Dec. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 F. App'x 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-barnhart-ca4-2004.