Nelson v. Baird

Texas Commission of Appeals

Nelson v. Baird

1 White & W. 711

CourtTexas Commission of Appeals

DecidedOctober 3, 1881

DocketNo. 2017, Op. Book No. 2, p. 566

StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 711 (Nelson v. Baird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nelson v. Baird, 1 White & W. 711 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 1236. Appeal bond; description of judgment. The judgment in justice’s court which was appealed from was for §261. The appeal bond described it as a judgment for $260, hut otherwise correctly described it. Held, the bond is sufficient. It gives the names of the parties, the court in which the judgment was rendered, and the day of its date. There can be no question that it refers to the very judgment appealed from, and that the discrepancy as to amount was a mere clerical error from which no doubt can arise as to the identity of the judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 1236. Appeal bond; description of judgment. The judgment in justice’s court which was appealed from was for §261. The appeal bond described it as a judgment for $260, hut otherwise correctly described it. Held, the bond is sufficient. It gives the names of the parties, the court in which the judgment was rendered, and the day of its date. There can be no question that it refers to the very judgment appealed from, and that the discrepancy as to amount was a mere clerical error from which no doubt can arise as to the identity of the judgment.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 White & W. 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-baird-texcommnapp-1881.