Nelson v. Armstrong

10 N.Y. St. Rep. 880
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1887
StatusPublished

This text of 10 N.Y. St. Rep. 880 (Nelson v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. Armstrong, 10 N.Y. St. Rep. 880 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Opinion

Dykman, J.

It was the object and purpose of this action to disaffirm and avoid certain conveyances of real property and nullify and invalidate the same in the interest of the plaintiff and other creditors of Abram Weiant, deceased.

The cause has been twice tried, and both trials resulted in favor of the plaintiff It is quite complicated but a laborious and careful examination has convinced us that the conclusion reached by the trial court is well sustained and justified by the facts and circumstances developed during the trial. A recitation and analysis of the testimony would be tedious and unprofitable.

We have examined all the exceptions of the appellant and discover no error.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Fbatt, J., concurs; Baenabd, P. J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 N.Y. St. Rep. 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-armstrong-nysupct-1887.