NELSON, ROBERT v. RED ROOF INN

2025 TN WC 61
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedAugust 27, 2025
Docket2024-70-1398
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 TN WC 61 (NELSON, ROBERT v. RED ROOF INN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
NELSON, ROBERT v. RED ROOF INN, 2025 TN WC 61 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2025).

Opinion

FILED Aug 27, 2025 03:52 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT JACKSON

ROBERT NELSON, ) Docket No.: 2024-70-1398 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 860083-2024 RED ROOF INN, ) Employer, ) Judge Robert Durham And ) EMPLOYERS’ PREFERRED ) INS. CO., ) Insurer. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING BENEFITS

This Court held an Expedited Hearing on August 21, 2025, on Mr. Nelson’s request that Red Roof Inn pay benefits for a wrist fracture he allegedly sustained at work. The Court denies Mr. Nelson’s request because he is unlikely to prove at trial that his wrist injury primarily arose out of and in the course and scope of his employment.

History of Claim

Mr. Nelson worked for Red Roof Inn as a general handyman. He testified on direct that on March 16, 2023, he tripped and fell over items on the floor as he was carrying a microwave and injured his right wrist. He also listed March 16 as the date of injury in his petition for benefit determination. Mr. Nelson immediately reported the injury to his supervisor but was not given a panel of doctors.

Mr. Nelson saw “Dr. Johnson” first for his injury, who referred him to orthopedist Kenneth Nord. He received unauthorized treatment from Dr. Nord, who monitored his blood pressure to see if it was safe to operate on his wrist. 1 Mr. Nelson worked for Red Roof Inn during this time.

1 Mr. Nelson did not submit any medical records other than an x-ray of his right wrist after surgery. 1 Dr. Nord performed surgery on November 30, 2023. Mr. Nelson asserted that Red Roof Inn only paid $1,000 of his surgical expenses and did not pay him disability benefits for his time off work. He testified that Dr. Nord took him off work for several weeks after the surgery and then restricted him from lifting more than two pounds. He did not return to work for Red Roof Inn and said that other than an occasional task performed for a friend, he has not worked anywhere since November 30 because of continued pain and limitations.

Mr. Nelson submitted several medical bills totaling several thousand dollars.

For its proof, Red Roof Inn entered Dr. Nord’s record of Mr. Nelson’s first visit on March 17. According to the note, Mr. Nelson said he suffered a right-wrist injury two and a half months earlier. The record did not include a description of how the injury occurred or attribute causation to Mr. Nelson’s work. Dr. Nord determined that Mr. Nelson suffered from a “scaphoid nonunion with advanced collapse deformity with severe bone-on-bone arthritis of the radial scaphoid joint.” He also diagnosed early arthritis in other parts of the wrist.

Red Roof Inn additionally provided an intake form from a pain clinic dated February 20, 2024. The form, signed by Mr. Nelson, stated that his injury occurred on February 16, 2023. Mr. Nelson said that his fiancée filled out the form because he could not understand it.

As to the date of injury, Mr. Nelson testified on cross-examination that the injury occurred on March 6, 2023. He said his former counsel completed the documents stating that the injury happened on March 16, and she told him that the actual date of injury was not important when filling out forms and other documentation.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Nelson must prove a likelihood of prevailing at a hearing on the merits that he is entitled to the requested benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2024).

To prove causation, Mr. Nelson must establish a specific incident, identifiable by time and place of occurrence, and primarily arising out of and in the course and scope of employment. Id. § 50-6-102(12)(A). Further, causation must be proven to a “reasonable degree of medical certainty,” which requires an expert medical opinion. Id. § 50-6- 102(12)(C).

While Mr. Nelson suffered an injury to his right wrist, the Court is not convinced that it happened at work. Mr. Nelson’s assertion that it did is unsupported by the record. No witnesses confirmed his testimony, and none of the medical records addressed causation or even mentioned how his injury occurred.

2 The date of the alleged injury is also in question. Mr. Nelson’s petition for benefit determination said the injury occurred on March 16. Dr. Nord’s March 17 record said that Mr. Nelson told him it occurred two and a half months earlier. The pain clinic new patient form listed February 16, and Mr. Nelson first testified at the hearing that it occurred on March 16 and then revised his testimony on cross-examination by saying it happened on March 6. These varying dates, without corroborating evidence, call Mr. Nelson’s credibility into question.

Thus, the Court holds that Mr. Nelson has not shown he is likely to prove that he suffered an injury to his right wrist while working for Red Roof Inn. His request for benefits is denied at this time.

This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on October 15, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. Central Time. The parties must call 615-253-0010. Failure to appear might result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

IT IS ORDERED.

ENTERED August 27, 2025.

_____________________________________ ROBERT DURHAM, JUDGE Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

3 Exhibits: 1. Petition for Benefit Determination 2. Mr. Nelson’s responses to Requests for Production of Documents 3. Dr. Nord’s March 17 record 4. Advanced Rehab New Patient Form 5. Text chain 6. Mr. Nelson’s timecards 7. Medical Bills 8. X-ray

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Order was sent as indicated on August 27, 2025.

Name Certified Via Via Service sent to: Mail Fax Email Robert Nelson X X Nelsonrobert196722@gmail.com 2262 N. Highland Avenue, Apt. 244 Jackson, TN 38305-4952 W. Troy Hart X wth@mijs.com Megan Jones majones@mijs.com dmduignan@mijs.com

_____________________________________ PENNY SHRUM, Court Clerk WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

4 Right to Appeal: If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To do so, you must: 1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.  If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed.  If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of the date the Compensation Order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney, if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. If no court reporter was present at the hearing, you may request from the Court Clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(c)(6)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 TN WC 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-robert-v-red-roof-inn-tennworkcompcl-2025.