Nelson, Ex Parte Ladell Ontwell
This text of Nelson, Ex Parte Ladell Ontwell (Nelson, Ex Parte Ladell Ontwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-77,001
EX PARTE LADELL ONTWELL NELSON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1235307 IN THE 183rd DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a
controlled substance with intent to deliver and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. The First
Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Nelson v. State, No. 01-10-00783-CR (Tex. App.–Houston
[1st Dist.], delivered October 27, 2011, no pet.).
Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel
failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed.
Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court 2
has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that there was a breakdown in the system and the
Applicant did not receive notification that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court
recommends that relief be granted. We agree with the trial court that the Applicant is entitled to
relief. However, counsel admits in his affidavit that he did not comply with the requirements of Rule
48.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure when he attempted to notify the Applicant of the
appellate court’s decision. Therefore, the record reflects that Applicant was deprived of his right to
pursue discretionary review on his own due to counsel’s failure to send proper notification. Ex parte
Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).
We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition
for discretionary review of the judgment of the First Court of Appeals in Cause No. 01-10-00783-CR
that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 1235307 from the 183rd District Court of Harris County.
Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date
on which this Court’s mandate issues.
Delivered: March 27, 2013 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nelson, Ex Parte Ladell Ontwell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-ex-parte-ladell-ontwell-texcrimapp-2013.