Nelson Et Ux. v. Hodgkins

Supreme Court of Florida

Nelson Et Ux. v. Hodgkins

116 So. 792, 95 Fla. 863

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 4, 1928

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 116 So. 792 (Nelson Et Ux. v. Hodgkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nelson Et Ux. v. Hodgkins, 116 So. 792, 95 Fla. 863 (Fla. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judg *864 ment to be given in the premises, it seems to the- Court that there is no error in the decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judg *864 ment to be given in the premises, it seems to the- Court that there is no error in the decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 So. 792, 95 Fla. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-et-ux-v-hodgkins-fla-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack