Nelson Co. v. J. & W. Cahill & Co.

131 N.Y.S. 576
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedOctober 16, 1911
StatusPublished

This text of 131 N.Y.S. 576 (Nelson Co. v. J. & W. Cahill & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson Co. v. J. & W. Cahill & Co., 131 N.Y.S. 576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from is too broad in its scope. It should be modified, by limiting the examination of the defendant solely to the matters set forth in the complaint, which are denied by the answer, and, as thus modified, affirmed, with disbursements to the appellant.

Order modified, by striking therefrom the words “and relative to the issues- in this action,” and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, but [577]*577with disbursements to the appellant, with permission to the plaintiff, to apply to the lower court to fix a date for the hearing and to provide for service in accordance with sections 873, 874, and 875 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 N.Y.S. 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-co-v-j-w-cahill-co-nyappterm-1911.