Nelson, Christopher Ray v. State

Opinion

Order entered October , 2012

In The Court of appeato jf iftb Ritotritt of Texaii at 312taila5 No. 05-12-00871-CR

CHRISTOPHER RAY NELSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296-81738-2011

ORDER

Appellant's brief is overdue. Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a

hearing to determine why appellant's brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall

make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to

prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel

has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain

appellant's presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant's

absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per

curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be

necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this

order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received, whichever is earlier.

DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE