Nelsen v. Rampone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nelsen v. Rampone

31 A.D.2d 933, 299 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4502

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 933 (Nelsen v. Rampone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nelsen v. Rampone, 31 A.D.2d 933, 299 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, libel, slander and expenses for medical care, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 4, 1967 after a nonjury trial, upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint and its award .of $1,525 against plaintiffs on the counterclaim. [934]*934Appeal dismissed, with costs, unless appellants file and serve a proper appendix within 30 days after entry of the order hereon. The appendix submitted on this appeal is patently insufficient for the purpose of passing .on the contentions raised in appellants’ brief. The trial produced at least 560 pages of transcript of which the appendix contains merely a few pages of testimony (see E.. P. Reynolds, Inc. v. Nager Elec. Go., 17 N Y 2d 51; Melville v. Melville, 29 A D 2d 679; Pollack v. Pollack, 25 A D 2d 756; CPLR 5528). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, libel, slander and expenses for medical care, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 4, 1967 after a nonjury trial, upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint and its award .of $1,525 against plaintiffs on the counterclaim. [934]*934Appeal dismissed, with costs, unless appellants file and serve a proper appendix within 30 days after entry of the order hereon. The appendix submitted on this appeal is patently insufficient for the purpose of passing .on the contentions raised in appellants’ brief. The trial produced at least 560 pages of transcript of which the appendix contains merely a few pages of testimony (see E.. P. Reynolds, Inc. v. Nager Elec. Go., 17 N Y 2d 51; Melville v. Melville, 29 A D 2d 679; Pollack v. Pollack, 25 A D 2d 756; CPLR 5528). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 933, 299 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelsen-v-rampone-nyappdiv-1969.