Nelrose Realty Co. v. Franke

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Nelrose Realty Co. v. Franke

127 A. 926, 3 N.J. Misc. 44, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 7

DecidedDecember 31, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 127 A. 926 (Nelrose Realty Co. v. Franke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nelrose Realty Co. v. Franke, 127 A. 926, 3 N.J. Misc. 44, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 7 (N.J. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cdeiam. .

. A rule to show cause was allowed in this case directed to Carl E. Franke, inspector of buildings of the township of Teaneck, Bergen county, New Jersey, why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not be issued, commanding him to issue a permit for the erection of a building in accordance with the plans and specifications filed by the relator.

We think the facts of this case fall within the principle laid clown in the case of Ignaciunas v. Risley, 1 N. J. Adv. R. 1023; affirmed, 2 Id. 852, which case is controlling.

A peremptory writ is ordered upon paying of the legal fees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cdeiam. .

. A rule to show cause was allowed in this case directed to Carl E. Franke, inspector of buildings of the township of Teaneck, Bergen county, New Jersey, why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not be issued, commanding him to issue a permit for the erection of a building in accordance with the plans and specifications filed by the relator.

We think the facts of this case fall within the principle laid clown in the case of Ignaciunas v. Risley, 1 N. J. Adv. R. 1023; affirmed, 2 Id. 852, which case is controlling.

A peremptory writ is ordered upon paying of the legal fees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 A. 926, 3 N.J. Misc. 44, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelrose-realty-co-v-franke-nj-1924.