Neloms v. Townsley

95 So. 3d 415, 2012 WL 3192804, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13068
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 8, 2012·No. No. 3D12-2049·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ruiz v. Farias, 43 So.3d 124, 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (“[T]he ‘resign-to-run’ law addresses terms that will run concurrently, not terms that in some other hypothetical case might run concurrently.”)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neloms v. Townsley, 95 So. 3d 415, 2012 WL 3192804, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13068 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

95 So. 3d 415 (Neloms v. Townsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ruiz v. Farias
43 So. 3d 124 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)