Neloms v. Townsley

95 So. 3d 415, 2012 WL 3192804, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13068
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 8, 2012
DocketNo. 3D12-2049
StatusPublished

This text of 95 So. 3d 415 (Neloms v. Townsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neloms v. Townsley, 95 So. 3d 415, 2012 WL 3192804, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13068 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ruiz v. Farias, 43 So.3d 124, 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (“[T]he ‘resign-to-run’ law addresses terms that will run concurrently, not terms that in some other hypothetical case might run concurrently.”)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ruiz v. Farias
43 So. 3d 124 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 So. 3d 415, 2012 WL 3192804, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neloms-v-townsley-fladistctapp-2012.