Neloms v. Mathis

105 S.E.2d 768, 98 Ga. App. 465, 1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 612
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 24, 1958·No. 37374·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Felton, Chief Judge.

Assuming for the sake of argument, that the plaintiff could not maintain an action for the loss of service of his minor child on the ground that the child was of such tender age as to be incapable of rendering such service, still the plaintiff also sought to recover damages for medical expenses incurred in the treatment of the child, and for these damages he could maintain an action. Krasner v. O’Dell, 89 Ga. App. 718 (2) (80 S. E. 2d 852).

Since the petition stated a cause of action for at least the medical expenses, the court erred in sustaining the general demurrer and in dismissing the action. Lucas v. Neidlinger, 210 Ga. 557 (5) (81 S. E. 2d 825); Reardon v. Bland, 206 Ga. 633 (5) (58 S. E. 2d 377); Gay v. Healan, 88 Ga. App. 533 (4) (77 S. E. 2d 47); Davis v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 82 Ga. App. 460 (e) (61 S. E. 2d 510).

Judgment reversed.

Quillian and Nichols, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neloms v. Mathis, 105 S.E.2d 768, 98 Ga. App. 465, 1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 612 (Ga. Ct. App. 1958).

105 S.E.2d 768 (Neloms v. Mathis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pinkerton National Detective Agency, Inc. v. Stevens
132 S.E.2d 119 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)