Nelm's Lessee v. Smith
4 H. & McH. 389
Opinion
The question is proper and ought to be answered.
[391] The witness was then permitted to declare whether he It new any other Glade according to the question proposed.
Veudict and judgment for the plaintiff. See Kilty’s Land Hold. Asst. 414.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nelm's Lessee v. Smith, 4 H. & McH. 389 (Va. Super. Ct. 1799).
4 H. & McH. 389 (Nelm's Lessee v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.