Nelly Lara v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 8, 2002·No. 03-02-00442-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00442-CR

Nelly Lara, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. A-01-0366-S, HONORABLE RAE LEIFESTE, JUDGE PRESIDING

Nelly Lara seeks to appeal from an order deferring adjudication. The order was rendered on March 13, 2002, after Lara pleaded guilty to possessing cocaine with intent to deliver. Lara filed a motion for new trial on April 2, and she filed her notice of appeal on June 4.

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 21.1 and 21.4 do not apply to orders deferring adjudication. Donovan v. State, 68 S.W.3d 633, 635-36 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002); Hammack v. State, 963 S.W.2d 199, 200-01 (Tex. App.CAustin 1998, no pet.). Lara=s motion for new trial was a nullity and did not extend the time for perfecting appeal. Hammack, 963 S.W.2d at 201. Because Lara=s notice of appeal was not filed within thirty days after the order deferring adjudication was rendered, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. Id.; see Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).

The appeal is dismissed.

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: August 8, 2002 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nelly Lara v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Nelly Lara v. State (Nelly Lara v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hammack v. State
963 S.W.2d 199 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Donovan v. State
68 S.W.3d 633 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2002)