Nelly Lara v. State
This text of Nelly Lara v. State (Nelly Lara v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 21.1 and 21.4 do not apply to orders deferring adjudication. Donovan v. State, 68 S.W.3d 633, 635-36 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002); Hammack v. State, 963 S.W.2d 199, 200-01 (Tex. App.--Austin 1998, no pet.). Lara's motion for new trial was a nullity and did not extend the time for perfecting appeal. Hammack, 963 S.W.2d at 201. Because Lara's notice of appeal was not filed within thirty days after the order deferring adjudication was rendered, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. Id.; see Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).
The appeal is dismissed.
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: August 8, 2002
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nelly Lara v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelly-lara-v-state-texapp-2002.