Nellums v. North Little Rock School District
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
MICHAEL NELLUMS PLAINTIFF
No. 4:19-cv-751-DPM
NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DEFENDANT
ORDER 1. The Court directs the Clerk to correct the docket. Doc. 27 is a motion to reply. The motion is granted. And the embedded reply is deemed filed. 2. Nellums’s motion to voluntarily dismiss his case, Doc. 24, is granted. Most of the District’s work will be useful if the case is refiled. And the District may seek any sunk costs, including attorney’s fees. FED. R. Civ. P. 41(d); Evans v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 623 F.2d 121, 122 (8th Cir. 1980). This option will, the Court concludes, eliminate any real prejudice from the tardy nonsuit. The District’s motion for summary judgment, Doc. 21, is denied as moot. So Ordered.
D.P. Marshak 2 United States District Judge Z_Defopur 1020 _
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nellums v. North Little Rock School District (Nellums v. North Little Rock School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.