Nellis Motor Sales v. Alcohol Beverage Control Commissioner

West Virginia Court of Claims

Nellis Motor Sales v. Alcohol Beverage Control Commissioner

13 Ct. Cl. 160

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedMarch 6, 1980

DocketCC-80-80

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Ct. Cl. 160 (Nellis Motor Sales v. Alcohol Beverage Control Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nellis Motor Sales v. Alcohol Beverage Control Commissioner, 13 Ct. Cl. 160 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based on the allegations of the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer.

Claimant seeks payment of the sum of $260.97 for services rendered to the respondent. In its Answer, the respondent admits the allegation set forth in the Notice of Claim that claimant’s bill was misplaced and not rendered to respondent until after the close of the fiscal year in question. During that fiscal year, sufficient funds were availabe in respondent’s appropriation from which the claim could have been paid. The respondent further acknowledges that the work was performed satisfactorily by claimant, and joins with the claimant in requesting that the claim be honored.

Based on the foregoing, the Court hereby makes an award to the claimant in the amount of $260.97.

Award of $260.97.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based on the allegations of the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer.

Claimant seeks payment of the sum of $260.97 for services rendered to the respondent. In its Answer, the respondent admits the allegation set forth in the Notice of Claim that claimant’s bill was misplaced and not rendered to respondent until after the close of the fiscal year in question. During that fiscal year, sufficient funds were availabe in respondent’s appropriation from which the claim could have been paid. The respondent further acknowledges that the work was performed satisfactorily by claimant, and joins with the claimant in requesting that the claim be honored.

Based on the foregoing, the Court hereby makes an award to the claimant in the amount of $260.97.

Award of $260.97.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Ct. Cl. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nellis-motor-sales-v-alcohol-beverage-control-commissioner-wvctcl-1980.