Nekoosa Edwards Paper Co. v. Railroad Commission

Supreme Court

Nekoosa Edwards Paper Co. v. Railroad Commission

283 U.S. 787, 51 S. Ct. 352

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 16, 1931·No. No. 218·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In view of the findings of fact by the state court, supported by the evidence, the judgment is affirmed. Portland Railway Light & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission of Oregon, 229 U. S. 397, 412; Miedreich v. Lauenstein, 232 U. S. 236, 243, 244; Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. North Dakota, 236 U. S. 585, 593.

Messrs. John W. Reynolds, Attorney General of Wisconsin, Herbert H. Naujoks, Assistant Attorney General, and H. A. Minaban were on the brief for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

In view of the findings of fact by the state court, supported by the evidence, the judgment is affirmed. Portland Railway Light & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission of Oregon, 229 U. S. 397, 412; Miedreich v. Lauenstein, 232 U. S. 236, 243, 244; Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. North Dakota, 236 U. S. 585, 593.

Messrs. John W. Reynolds, Attorney General of Wisconsin, Herbert H. Naujoks, Assistant Attorney General, and H. A. Minaban were on the brief for appellee.

Nekoosa Edwards Paper Co. v. Railroad Commission, 283 U.S. 787, 51 S. Ct. 352 (1931).

Pincite

283 U.S. 787 (Nekoosa Edwards Paper Co. v. Railroad Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related