NEKHAILA v. Dept. of Children and Families

971 So. 2d 927, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 20099, 2007 WL 4404575
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 19, 2007
Docket3D06-2689
StatusPublished

This text of 971 So. 2d 927 (NEKHAILA v. Dept. of Children and Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
NEKHAILA v. Dept. of Children and Families, 971 So. 2d 927, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 20099, 2007 WL 4404575 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

971 So.2d 927 (2007)

Samira NEKHAILA, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 3D06-2689.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 19, 2007.

Samira Nekhaila, in proper person.

Javier A. Ley-Soto, for appellee.

Before COPE, SHEPHERD, and CORTIÑAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a final order of the Florida Department of Children and Families, which ordered the appellant to repay amounts which were overpaid by the Medicaid Program. The order found that $931.81 was overpaid because of an error of the Department, and $2597.71 through error by the appellant. Under Florida law the Department must recover overpayments, regardless of whether overpayment is the result of an error on the part of the Department or the recipient. See § 414.41, Fla. Stat. (2005); Payne v. Fla. Dep't of Children & Family Servs., 875 So.2d 763 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Willis v. Dep't of Children & Family Servs., 735 So.2d 585 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). While we sympathize with the appellant's situation, *928 the statute requires repayment even though a significant portion of the error was attributable to the Department.

The Department has indicated that it has a payment plan option which is available to all benefit recovery clients, such as the appellant. This court's affirmance of the repayment order is without prejudice to the appellant to contact the Department to work out a payment plan, as indicated in the Department's additional response filed in this court in October 2007.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Payne v. FLA. DEPT OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES
875 So. 2d 763 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Willis v. Dept. of Children & Family Serv.
735 So. 2d 585 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
971 So. 2d 927, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 20099, 2007 WL 4404575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nekhaila-v-dept-of-children-and-families-fladistctapp-2007.