Neisser F. Lezcano v. The State of Florida
This text of Neisser F. Lezcano v. The State of Florida (Neisser F. Lezcano v. The State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 21, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D23-0117 Lower Tribunal No. F18-12613C
Neisser F. Lezcano, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa Tinkler Mendez, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Deborah Prager, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Duest v. State, 462 So. 2d 446, 449 (Fla. 1985) (“The
law is well established that admission of photographic evidence is within the
trial court's discretion and that a court's ruling will not be disturbed on appeal
unless there is a showing of clear abuse.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Neisser F. Lezcano v. The State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neisser-f-lezcano-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.