Neissen v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Neissen v. City of St. Paul

83 N.W. 376, 80 Minn. 414, 1900 Minn. LEXIS 526

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJuly 11, 1900

DocketNos. 11,964—(118)

StatusPublished

This text of 83 N.W. 376 (Neissen v. City of St. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neissen v. City of St. Paul, 83 N.W. 376, 80 Minn. 414, 1900 Minn. LEXIS 526 (Mich. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

This was a personal injury action, and the defendant appealed from an order overruling its demurrer to the complaint. The record presents the question whether the provisions of the charter of the city of St. Paul as to giving notice of personal injuries were repealed by Laws 1897, c. 248, covering the same subject. We hold, following Nicol v. City of St. Paul, infra, that they were.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM.

This was a personal injury action, and the defendant appealed from an order overruling its demurrer to the complaint. The record presents the question whether the provisions of the charter of the city of St. Paul as to giving notice of personal injuries were repealed by Laws 1897, c. 248, covering the same subject. We hold, following Nicol v. City of St. Paul, infra, that they were.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 N.W. 376, 80 Minn. 414, 1900 Minn. LEXIS 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neissen-v-city-of-st-paul-minn-1900.