Neiman v. City of Chelsea
This text of 40 N.E.2d 663 (Neiman v. City of Chelsea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action of tort under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 84, §§ 1, 15, to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff when she stepped into a small depression two inches deep, at the most, in the sidewalk of Chestnut Street, a public way in Chelsea. The judge, sitting without a jury, found “as a fact” that the condition described did not constitute a defect, and the plaintiff alleged exceptions. This finding was permissible on the evidence and was not vitiated by the manner in which the judge dealt with the defendant’s so called "request for ruling §1.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 N.E.2d 663, 310 Mass. 831, 1942 Mass. LEXIS 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neiman-v-city-of-chelsea-mass-1942.