Neilson v. Lagow

48 U.S. 772
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 15, 1849
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 U.S. 772 (Neilson v. Lagow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neilson v. Lagow, 48 U.S. 772 (1849).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice TANEY

delivered the opinion of the court.

It appears, that, at the trial in the State court, the plaintiff in error claimed the land in dispute under au authority which he alleged had been exercised by the 'Secretary of the Treasury in behalf of the United States; and the decision was against the validity of the authority thus alleged to have been exercised. Whether the title, of the plaintiff in error can be maintained under it, or not, will be the subject of inquiry when the case is heard on its merits. That question is not now before the court, and the only point tó be determined at this time is, whether we have jurisdiction to try and decide it. We think it is:evidently one of the cases prescribed for in the twenty-fifth section of the act of 1789 ; and the motion to dismiss is therefore overruled.

Order. .

On.consideration of the motion made in this cause on ¿ prior day of the present term, to wit, on Friday, the 2d instant, to dismiss the writ of error, and of the arguménts of counsel-thereupon had, as well against as in support of the motion, it is now here ordered by the court, that the said motion be, and . the same is hereby, overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall Neilson, in Error v. Wilson Lagow
48 U.S. 772 (Supreme Court, 1849)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 U.S. 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neilson-v-lagow-scotus-1849.