Neilson v. Columbian Insurance Co.

3 Cai. Cas. 108
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1805·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Per curiam.

A new trial must be awarded with costs to abide the event of the suit. The charge of the judge, as stated in the case was clearly wrong. So long as the corn physically existed, there could not be a total loss. Though good for nothing, the defendants were not liable, being protected by. the clause in the memorandum. The direction was contrary to our determination in Maggrath and Higgins v. Church. It ought also to have been [111]*111left to the jury, as a material point whether the vessel could not have been repaired at the Cape de Verd Islands, so as to perform her voyage. This does not appear to have been distinctly submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neilson v. Columbian Insurance Co., 3 Cai. Cas. 108 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

3 Cai. Cas. 108 (Neilson v. Columbian Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wallerstein v. . the Columbian Insurance Co.
44 N.Y. 204 (New York Court of Appeals, 1870)
Wallerstein v. Columbian Insurance
3 Rob. 528 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1865)
Depeyster v. Sun Mutual Insurance
17 Barb. 306 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)
Poole v. Protection Insurance Co.
14 Conn. 47 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1840)
Aranzamendi v. Louisiana Insurance
2 La. 432 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1831)