Neilson v. Amodeo

26 A.D.2d 840, 274 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3175
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 31, 1966·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered April 6, 1965, in plaintiff’s favor upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and complaint dismissed, without costs. In our opinion, plaintiff, as a matter of law, failed to establish that defendants had actual or constructive notice of the alleged icy condition prior to the accident and had permitted that condition to exist for an unreasonable time (cf. Hoffman v. Bachrach, 20 A D 2d 790; Preuschoff v. Wank, 16 A D 2d 690, 691; see 5 Warren, Negligence, § 5.77, pp. 596-597). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neilson v. Amodeo, 26 A.D.2d 840, 274 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3175 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

26 A.D.2d 840 (Neilson v. Amodeo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Drake v. Prudential Insurance
153 A.D.2d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)