Neilly v. Mark Jay Kaufman, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Neilly v. Mark Jay Kaufman, P.A.

497 So. 2d 1315, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2465, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10787

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 25, 1986

DocketNo. BL-8

StatusPublished

This text of 497 So. 2d 1315 (Neilly v. Mark Jay Kaufman, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neilly v. Mark Jay Kaufman, P.A., 497 So. 2d 1315, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2465, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10787 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

The trial court could not properly issue the injunction in this case because there was no showing of continuing conduct with the likelihood of irreparable harm and no showing that an adequate remedy at law was not available. This was not a disciplinary proceeding under the Florida Bar Integration Rule, article XI, Rule 11.14. The preliminary injunction dated December 20, [1316]*13161985, against John J. Neilly, Jr., is QUASHED.

ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARFIELD, Judge.

The trial court could not properly issue the injunction in this case because there was no showing of continuing conduct with the likelihood of irreparable harm and no showing that an adequate remedy at law was not available. This was not a disciplinary proceeding under the Florida Bar Integration Rule, article XI, Rule 11.14. The preliminary injunction dated December 20, [1316]*13161985, against John J. Neilly, Jr., is QUASHED.

ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

497 So. 2d 1315, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2465, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neilly-v-mark-jay-kaufman-pa-fladistctapp-1986.