Neill v. Brooklyn El. Railroad
This text of 34 N.Y.S. 1144 (Neill v. Brooklyn El. Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York City Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The learned counsel for the appellant contends that the damages awarded by the jury were excessive. We have very carefully read the appeal book and the briefs in the case, and, while the verdict was large, we do not think that we should exercise our power to reduce the damages. The court was right in refusing to compel the plaintiff to remove his clothing and exhibit his knee to the jury. Roberts v. Railroad Co., 29 Hun, 154; McQuigan v. Railroad Co., 129 N. Y. 50, 29 N. E. 235; Elfers v. Woolley, 116 N. Y. 294, 22 N. E. 548; Lyon v. Railroad Co., 142 N. Y. 298, 37 N. E. 113. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 N.Y.S. 1144, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neill-v-brooklyn-el-railroad-nycityct-1895.