Neill v. Brooklyn El. Railroad

34 N.Y.S. 1144, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 877
New York City Court·Decided June 24, 1895·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The learned counsel for the appellant contends that the damages awarded by the jury were excessive. We have very carefully read the appeal book and the briefs in the case, and, while the verdict was large, we do not think that we should exercise our power to reduce the damages. The court was right in refusing to compel the plaintiff to remove his clothing and exhibit his knee to the jury. Roberts v. Railroad Co., 29 Hun, 154; McQuigan v. Railroad Co., 129 N. Y. 50, 29 N. E. 235; Elfers v. Woolley, 116 N. Y. 294, 22 N. E. 548; Lyon v. Railroad Co., 142 N. Y. 298, 37 N. E. 113. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neill v. Brooklyn El. Railroad, 34 N.Y.S. 1144, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 877 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

34 N.Y.S. 1144 (Neill v. Brooklyn El. Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elfers v. . Woolley
22 N.E. 548 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Lyon v. Manhattan Railway Co.
37 N.E. 113 (New York Court of Appeals, 1894)
McQuigan v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
29 N.E. 235 (New York Court of Appeals, 1891)