Neildan Construction Corp. v. Angona

209 A.D.2d 389, 619 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11035
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 7, 1994·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—In an action to quiet [390] title to real property, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), dated June 17, 1993, which granted the third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The third-party defendant was entitled to rely upon the facially valid power of attorney in this case since the circumstances surrounding its presentation would not have put a reasonable person on notice that something was amiss (see, Grasso v Fiumara, 167 AD2d 510; cf., Collision Plan Unlimited v Bankers Trust Co., 63 NY2d 827). Thus, the Supreme Court did not err in dismissing the third-party complaint. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neildan Construction Corp. v. Angona, 209 A.D.2d 389, 619 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11035 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 389 (Neildan Construction Corp. v. Angona) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oliveto Holdings, Inc. v. Rattenni
110 A.D.3d 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
US Bank National Ass'n v. Gestetner
74 A.D.3d 1538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Hudson Enterprises, Ltd. v. Wasserman
256 A.D.2d 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)