Neil v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Neil v. State

699 So. 2d 1392, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11613, 1997 WL 665057

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 17, 1997

DocketNo. 96-3057

StatusPublished

This text of 699 So. 2d 1392 (Neil v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neil v. State, 699 So. 2d 1392, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11613, 1997 WL 665057 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

We grant the motion for clarification on the issue of Neil’s entitlement to credit for time served, in the event this issue might be relevant in his anticipated 3.850 motion. A defendant is entitled to credit for time served on community control during the pendency of his suspended sentence. Norton v. State, 691 So.2d 616 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), Warrington v. State, 660 So.2d 385 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Motion for Clarification GRANTED.

W. SHARP, HARRIS and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI