Neil v. State
699 So. 2d 1392, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11613, 1997 WL 665057
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
We grant the motion for clarification on the issue of Neil’s entitlement to credit for time served, in the event this issue might be relevant in his anticipated 3.850 motion. A defendant is entitled to credit for time served on community control during the pendency of his suspended sentence. Norton v. State, 691 So.2d 616 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), Warrington v. State, 660 So.2d 385 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
Motion for Clarification GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Neil v. State, 699 So. 2d 1392, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11613, 1997 WL 665057 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
699 So. 2d 1392 (Neil v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Norton v. State
691 So. 2d 616 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Warrington v. State
660 So. 2d 385 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)